高伟, 刘存, 张文军等. 不同长桁截面复合材料加筋板轴压屈曲分析. 力学与实践, 2022, 44(5): 1143-1150. doi: 10.6052/1000-0879-21-521
引用本文: 高伟, 刘存, 张文军等. 不同长桁截面复合材料加筋板轴压屈曲分析. 力学与实践, 2022, 44(5): 1143-1150. doi: 10.6052/1000-0879-21-521
Gao Wei, Liu Cun, Zhang Wenjun, et al. Axial compression buckling of stiffened panel of composite materials with different stringer section. Mechanics in Engineering, 2022, 44(5): 1143-1150. doi: 10.6052/1000-0879-21-521
Citation: Gao Wei, Liu Cun, Zhang Wenjun, et al. Axial compression buckling of stiffened panel of composite materials with different stringer section. Mechanics in Engineering, 2022, 44(5): 1143-1150. doi: 10.6052/1000-0879-21-521

不同长桁截面复合材料加筋板轴压屈曲分析

AXIAL COMPRESSION BUCKLING OF STIFFENED PANEL OF COMPOSITE MATERIALS WITH DIFFERENT STRINGER SECTION

  • 摘要: 基于轴向压缩载荷工况,加筋板重量相同、长桁轴线间距相等、长桁截面占比相当的前提,采用试验和数值计算方法研究“I”形加筋板和“J”形加筋板屈曲特性及其失效模式。研究结果表明:“I”形加筋板与“J”形加筋板抗屈曲承载能力相当,后屈曲承载能力较“J”形加筋板提高约19.8%;特征值屈曲法计算值较试验值误差约11%,究其主要原因是特征值理论不考虑加载过程中长桁刚度对蒙皮支持变弱的影响,故其计算值较试验值偏大;考虑就地效应及横向应力分量对基体剪切强度的影响,构建加筋板失效模型,计算值与试验值误差约8%,且预测的失效模式与试验破坏模式一致性较好。

     

    Abstract: Based on the axial compression load condition, the same weight of stiffened plates, the same distance between stringer and the same proportion of stringer section, the buckling characteristics and failure modes of “I” stiffened plates and “J” stiffened plates are studied by test and numerical calculation methods. The results show that the flexural capacity of “I” stiffened plate is the same as that of “J” stiffened plate, and the post-buckling capacity of the former is about 19.8% higher than that of the latter, and the error of eigenvalue buckling method from the test is about 11%. The main reason is that the eigenvalue theory does not consider the influence of stringer stiffness on the weakening of skin support during loading, so the calculated value is larger than the test value. Considering the influence of local effect and transverse stress component on matrix shear strength, a failure model of stiffened plate is developed. The error between the calculated value and the test value is about 8%, and the predicted failure mode is in good agreement with the test failure mode.

     

/

返回文章
返回