韩永要, 赵国志, 李向东, 方清. 长管体与长杆体侵彻靶板对比研究[J]. 力学与实践, 2004, 26(5). DOI: 10.6052/1000-0992-2003-294
引用本文: 韩永要, 赵国志, 李向东, 方清. 长管体与长杆体侵彻靶板对比研究[J]. 力学与实践, 2004, 26(5). DOI: 10.6052/1000-0992-2003-294
TERMINAL BALLISTIC PERFORMANCE COMPARISON BETWEEN[J]. MECHANICS IN ENGINEERING, 2004, 26(5). DOI: 10.6052/1000-0992-2003-294
Citation: TERMINAL BALLISTIC PERFORMANCE COMPARISON BETWEEN[J]. MECHANICS IN ENGINEERING, 2004, 26(5). DOI: 10.6052/1000-0992-2003-294

长管体与长杆体侵彻靶板对比研究

TERMINAL BALLISTIC PERFORMANCE COMPARISON BETWEEN

  • 摘要: 为解决大长径比穿甲弹带来的问题,有必要设计一种由长杆体和长管体组成的异形侵彻体. 通过试验和数值模拟的方法,对同材料、同质量、同长度的长管体与长杆体对半无限均质靶板的侵彻能力进行了比较研究,描述了长管体和长杆体的侵彻物理图像,得出了两种侵彻体的质量、速度随时间的变化规律. 试验和数值模拟结果均表明,相同条件下,同质量同长度长管体的侵彻能力要差于长杆体,长管体的速度和质量随时间下降速率均大于长杆体.

     

    Abstract: A telescopic penetrator composed of long rod and long tube is designedto solve the problems caused by slenderprojectile (large length / diameter ratio). By means of experimentsand numerical simulations, the performancesof long tube and long rod with the same mass and length in the samematerial normally against semi-infiniteRHA(rolled homogeneous armor) are compared. The penetration patterns ofthe long tube and long rod aredescribed. The relationships of velocity vs. time andmass vs. time for two kinds of penetratorsare also obtained. Both the experimental and the numericalresults indicate that thedecreasing rates of long tubular velocityand mass are greater than that of long rod in the penetration course.Therefore, the penetrationperformance of the long tube is inferior to that of the long rod.

     

/

返回文章
返回